1000 TIMES AGAINST DUGINISM: I RATHER LIVE UNDER NEOLIBERALISM/AMERICANISM (WHICH I ABHOR) THAN ISLAMISM. islamism

10000 times NO to DUGINISM: read his views hereunder. I RATHER LIVE UNDER NEOLIBRALISM AND AMERICANISM (which i abhor) OR THE CHINESE THAN UNDER ISLAMISM 1000 TIMES PRO GUILLAUME FAYE ( Auteur de ‘la Colonisation de l’Europe’ 1999) 1000 TIMES AGAINST ALAIN DE BENOÎST ( qui préconise le droit des muselmans de s’installer en tant que société paralelle en Europe).

The horror scenario by ALEXANDER DUGIN:
China is partner for multipolarity not the entity to merge with – certainly not for Russia (it will simply disappear) nor for Europe. There are no affinities between Russians and Chineses at all and no considerable Chinese population inside of Russia (not yet). The strategic partnership is quite different thing. Muslims form part of Russian population – the important minority. So islamophoby implies immediately the split of Russia. The difference between Europe and Russia in our attitude to islam: for us muslims are organic parts of the whole, for Europe they are post-colonial wave of re-invaders from outer (geopolitical/cultural) space. But having the common enemy (globalist oligarchic liberal atlanticist pro-Pussy Riot/pro-Femen, pro-gay marriage, anti-Putin, anti-Iran, anti-Chavez, anti-social justice) elite – we all need to find common strategy with muslims – our traditions are quite different but antitraditional world that attacks us is the same.

Well, I do agree with K.R. Bolton, who considers ‘Multiculturallism as a Process of Globalisation’ (Ab Aeterno, nov 2009, nr 1, p25-31) and that themata as preservation of European culture, curbing donwn immigration and islamisation cannot but insufficiently adressed without demanding the deconstruction of the international banking system with its 1 to 33 times credit creation and speculation unrelated to the real economy, but that doesn’t bring me to the point of view, that fighting islamisation is a mere deflection from the real issue. It is the real issue and at least corroborative of the first mentioned and certainly not a panacee against it. See my writings on muslim (micro-)finance under ‘publications’ on this website.

Here the dangerous talks by Dugin, who claims the coming into existence of an islamic shcisma: Saoudi-wahabi pro America one and a traditionalist one friendly to Russians (Christians). I dont see any scientific reference for this nonsense idea, that serves his empire building but not Europe’s safety Read Dugin yourself:iИсламский мир, вероятно, расколется, на саудовско-ваххабитскую проамериканскую часть, враждебную России, и дружественные нам традиционные мусульманские общества. Главным противником Евразии, по законам геополитики, продолжит оставаться Северная Америка, в то время как южная часть американского континента, демонстрирующая стремление к многополярности, с высокой вероятностью перейдет на нашу сторону.